The use of ai-based adaptive homework and teacher feedback: a comparative analysis of their impact on students in rural and urban areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18476615
Abstract
This study examines the comparative impact of AI-based adaptive homework and teacher feedback on students in rural and urban areas. The introduction justifies the relevance of the topic through the rapid development of digital education, existing educational inequalities between regions, and the scientific-pedagogical significance of adaptive technologies. The main objective of the research is to empirically determine how AI-based adaptive tasks influence students’ academic achievement, motivation, and responsiveness to teacher feedback across different geographical contexts. A quasi-experimental approach was employed in the methodology, with pre- and post-tests, platform-generated statistical data, and semi-structured interviews serving as the primary research instruments. The results indicate that urban students demonstrated a 25% increase in post-test scores, while rural students showed an 18% increase. Additionally, the urban group exhibited higher engagement with feedback, faster task completion, and a more dynamic progression toward advanced task levels. The conclusion emphasizes that adaptive technologies are effective in both settings; however, technical infrastructure, digital literacy, and teacher competence significantly influence outcomes. The findings have practical implications for integrating AI tools into school education, reducing regional educational disparities, and preparing teachers for digital pedagogy.
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence adaptive homework AI feedback rural and urban students digital education individualized instruction learning effectivenessReferences
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
Baker, R. S. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Bringing it all together. In OECD (Ed.), OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://learninganalytics.upenn.edu/ryanbaker/oecd-baker.pdf
Koedinger, K. R., Ning, H., Jia, J., et al. (2023). An astonishing regularity in student learning rate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(13), e2221311120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2221311120
Thomas, D. R., Lin, J., Gatz, E., et al. (2023). Improving student learning with hybrid human–AI tutoring: A three-study quasi-experimental investigation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.11274
VanLehn, K., Milner, F., Banerjee, C., & Wetzel, J. (2024). A step-based tutoring system to teach underachieving students how to construct algebraic models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00328-3
Woolf, B. P., Arroyo, I., Woolf, J., Kulikowich, J., & Burleson, W. (2023). Face readers: The frontier of computer vision and math learning. In Human and AI-Driven Math Tutoring: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop at AIED 2023. https://commons.clarku.edu/faculty_computer_sciences/6/
Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
Selwyn, N. (2024). On the limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 10, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062
Perrotta, C., & Selwyn, N. (2020). Deep learning goes to school: Toward a relational understanding of AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1686017
VanLehn, K., & Chi, M. (2021). The impact of step-based and substep-based tutoring. Computers & Education, 170, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104235
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Malika Bakhromova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
