Discursive representation of the time concept in AI systems: A comparative analysis of temporal framing in Uzbek-language AI-generated content
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806789
Abstract
This paper investigates how different artificial intelligence systems – namely ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Gemini 1.5 Pro, Qwen, and the Uzbek-language platform Salom-ai.uz – encode temporal concepts when generating Uzbek-language texts. Drawing on a purpose-built elicitation corpus of 24 AI-generated responses to six prompt categories targeting evidentiality, aspect contrast, cyclic time, habitual present, epistemic modality, and conceptual metaphor, this study conducts a systematic discourse analysis using an original seven-category error taxonomy. The findings reveal a hierarchy of temporal fidelity across systems, with Gemini demonstrating the strongest preservation of Uzbek evidential markers, while ChatGPT and Salom-ai.uz exhibit systematic TIME IS MONEY metaphor calquing from English. A paradoxical finding – that the Uzbek-targeted system Salom-ai.uz performed worst on evidentiality retention – points to the insufficiency of the target-language labelling without morphologically informed training. The study contributes an original error taxonomy and the concept of 'evidential erasure' to the emerging field of computational linguistics applied to low-resource agglutinative languages.
Keywords:
Temporal framing evidentiality AI-generated text Uzbek linguistics discourse analysis aspect conceptual metaphor large language modelsReferences
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 610–623. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge University Press.
Johanson, L. (2002). Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. Curzon Press.
Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. Routledge.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. Macmillan.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From 'thought and language' to 'thinking for speaking‘. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Surayyo Marimbaeva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
