Key Stakeholders of General Inclusive Education in Western Countries and Uzbekistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20808204
Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of the key stakeholders in general inclusive education within Western countries and Uzbekistan. Based on the theoretical foundations of comparative pedagogy, the study examines the roles, statuses, and interaction mechanisms of the child, parents, teachers, state bodies, and civil society. The analysis reveals that Western models are characterized by a horizontal, partnership-based structure where stakeholders operate with a high degree of autonomy and the child is recognized as a socially active subject. In contrast, the Uzbek model is undergoing a gradual institutionalization, initially shaped by a centralized, state-regulated vertical system. While normative frameworks are in place, the transition to a systemic, multidisciplinary, and collaborative model remains a crucial challenge. The article concludes that the effectiveness of inclusive education is not solely dependent on the presence of distinct actors but on the establishment of stable, systemic, and coordinated relationships based on mutual trust, shared responsibility, and joint decision-making.
Keywords:
Inclusive education stakeholders comparative pedagogy Western countries Uzbekistan child-centered approach partnership model institutional cooperationReferences
Wolfson, B. L. (2003). Comparative Pedagogy. Moscow: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Education. Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01002087625
Dzhurinsky, A. N. (2013). Comparative Education: Challenges of the 21st Century. Moscow: Prometheus. Available at: https://www.mgpu.ru/publication/sravnitelnaya-pedagogika-vyzovy-xxi-veka/
Malofeev, N. N. (2011). Special Education in a Changing World: Europe. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye. Available at: https://ikp-rao.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/malofeev_n.n.-evropa.pdf
Dzhurinsky, A. N. (2011). Pedagogy of Interethnic Communication and Comparative Education. Moscow: Sputnik+. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22437188
Alekhina, S. V. (2014). Inclusive Education: History and Contemporary State. Moscow: MGPPU. Available at: https://mgppu.ru/project/inclusive/books/Alekhina_2014.pdf
Alekhina, S. V. (2016). “Parental Participation in the Monitoring of Inclusive Education”. Inclusive Education: Practice and Research, No. 2. 35-45. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27349234
Malofeev, N. N. (2009). “The Role of the Family in the System of Special Education”. Almanac of the Institute of Correctional Pedagogy, No. 12. 270-275.
Available at: https://almanac.ikp.ru/articles/almanac-12-04
Dzhurinsky, A. N. (2014). Education in the Modern World: Comparative Analysis. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23337792
Wolfson, B. L. (2008). “State Priorities in Educational Policy: A Comparative Analysis”. Pedagogy, No. 7. 230-238. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13072074
Wolfson, B. L. (2005). “Civil Society and Education: Problems of Interaction”. Comparative Education, No. 3. 190-198. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11771556
Wolfson, B. L. (2010). “Institutional Coordination of Actors in Educational Systems”. Pedagogical Education and Science, No. 5. 160-165. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15254101
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Korkem Allamurat qizi Jalgasova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
