Developing prospective English teachers’ written discourse competence in a digital learning environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23133209
Abstract
This article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations for developing prospective English language teachers’ written discourse competence in a digital learning environment. Written discourse competence is interpreted through thematic unity, global and local coherence, cohesion, logical relations, genre appropriacy, and the management of writer-reader interaction. The study reviews Uzbek and international scholarship on foreign language teaching methodology, pedagogical technologies, digital competence, and academic writing in order to clarify the didactic potential of digital tools. A five-stage methodological model is proposed, based on the purposeful use of electronic learning resources, collaborative digital documents, corpus and information-search tools, automated writing feedback systems, AI-assisted tools, and e-portfolios. The model integrates discourse orientation, digital planning, text construction, multi-source feedback, revision, and reflection within a recursive writing process. The article further argues that academic integrity, authorial responsibility, critical evaluation of automated feedback, and sustained teacher mediation should remain essential methodological conditions when digital technologies are incorporated into writing instruction.
Keywords:
Written discourse competence digital learning environment prospective English teacher academic writing coherence cohesion digital feedback e-portfolio reflectionReferences
Abduqodirov, A. A., & Toshtemirov, D. E. (2019). Ta’lim muassasalarida axborot-kommunikatsiya texnologiyalaridan foydalanish metodikasi: Monografiya. Universitet.
Begimqulov, U. Sh. (2007). Pedagogik ta’limda zamonaviy axborot texnologiyalarini joriy etishning ilmiy-nazariy asoslari. Fan.
Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 1162454. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Ishmuhamedov, R., & Yuldashev, M. (2016). Ta’lim va tarbiyada innovatsion pedagogik texnologiyalar. Nihol.
Jalolov, J. (2012). Chet til o‘qitish metodikasi. O‘qituvchi. https://cspu.uz/chet-tili-oqitish-metodikasi
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2019, October 8). O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida (PF-5847-son Farmoni). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-4545884
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2020, October 5). “Raqamli O‘zbekiston – 2030” strategiyasini tasdiqlash va uni samarali amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida (PF-6079-son Farmoni). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-5030957
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Tolipov, O‘. Q., & Usmonboyeva, M. (2006). Pedagogik texnologiyalarning tatbiqiy asoslari. Fan. https://library.dtpi.uz/uz/adabiyotlar/oquv-qollanma/pedagogik-texnologiyalarning-tatbiqiy-asoslari
Wang, Y., & Xie, Q. (2022). Diagnosing EFL undergraduates’ discourse competence in academic writing. Assessing Writing, 53, Article 100641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100641
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gulshoda O‘tkir qizi Damirova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
