The theoretical foundations of constructing and expressing collective knowledge in political discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23860517
Abstract
This article explores the theoretical basis of how collective knowledge is constructed and communicated in political discourse through the perspectives of sociocognitive linguistics, discourse analysis, and critical discourse studies. It investigates how shared assumptions, collective memories, social identities, and ideological orientations are conveyed through linguistic resources such as presupposition, personal and collective pronouns, metaphor, evaluative expressions, and framing strategies. Particular emphasis is placed on the capacity of political discourse to influence public understanding, shape interpretations of social and political events, and legitimise particular viewpoints. The article further proposes an analytical framework for a comparative investigation of Uzbek and English political discourse, focusing on common linguistic and cognitive mechanisms alongside features shaped by specific cultural and historical contexts. Rather than presenting empirical findings, the study synthesises theoretical perspectives and establishes a conceptual foundation for subsequent research. Its framework may support further investigations into the complex relationship between language, collectively shared knowledge, and the exercise of political power in different sociocultural environments.
Keywords:
Collective knowledge political discourse sociocognitive approach common ground presupposition collective identity framing intertextualityReferences
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books. https://archive.org/details/socialconstructi00berg
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=discourse-and-social-change--9780745612188
Flowerdew, J., & Leong, S. (2010). Presumed knowledge in the discursive construction of socio-political and cultural identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2240–2252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.007
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499
van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/discourse-and-knowledge/
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/methods-of-critical-discourse-studies/book242185
De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993712
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Blackwell.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nuriddin Abdirashid o‘g‘li Chulliyev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
