Digital revision portfolios for developing English writing skills in Uzbek secondary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23863606
Abstract
This article examines how digital revision portfolios can support the development of English writing skills in Uzbek general secondary schools. It addresses the pedagogical distinction between correcting a text and helping learners understand their own revision decisions. The study uses a focused narrative review of literature on second language writing, educational technology, collaborative writing, automated feedback, and formative assessment. On this basis, it proposes a classroom model combining an initial draft, selected feedback, a revised text, and a brief learner reflection. The model prioritises meaningful changes in content and organisation alongside grammatical accuracy. Particular attention is given to teacher guidance, accessible technology, individual authorship, and the evaluation of independent writing. The article offers practical criteria for analysing revision quality and outlines a possible design for subsequent classroom research. It concludes that digital portfolios should be evaluated through learners’ reasoning and transfer of learning rather than through the number of corrections or platform activities alone.
Keywords:
Digital revision portfolio English writing secondary education formative assessment feedback literacy learner reflection independent writingReferences
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681
Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 1162454. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251
Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.004
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Nunes, A., Cordeiro, C., Limpo, T., & Castro, S. L. (2022). Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation systems in school settings: A systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2020. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(2), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12635
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2023). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation on writing quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(4), 875–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221127300
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 E’zoza Baxtiyor qizi Omonova, Aziza Batirovna Musoyeva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
