Passive voice constructions in English
Abstract
This article examines the significance of Passive Voice and provides information about the diversity of its forms, many of which are not appreciated in discussions of the passive voice’s purported flaws. The following is a description of three reasons why the passive voice is used, based on psycholinguistic study findings: First, speakers employ the passive voice to accommodate accessible concepts; second, the passive form enables writers to maintain topic continuity and adhere to the Given-New principle of communication; and third, passive sentences are not communicatively equivalent to actives, so active sentence paraphrases may occasionally distort the writer’s message. The study emphasizes that the passive uniquely allows for the omission of the agent, which is essential when the doer is unknown, irrelevant, or when the emphasis is meant to be on the recipient or outcome of the action rather than its instigator. The article concludes that mastering the passive voice enhances, rather than diminishes, a writer’s expressive capacity, enabling more precise emphasis, better coherence, and alignment with natural cognitive processing.
References
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press.
Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, V. S., & Yoshita, H. (2003). Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 669–692.
Ferreira, F (2020). In defense of the Passive Voice. American Psychological Association.
Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success. Learning and Motivation, 49, 209–246.
Macdonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(226).
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sevinch Shodmon qizi Avazova, Dildora Ikromjon qizi Babaxanova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
