Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Students’ Look
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21720849
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and creative media platforms has fundamentally transformed higher education by providing innovative opportunities for personalized, collaborative, and technology-enhanced learning. AI-powered applications, including ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, Claude AI, and Canva AI, have become increasingly integrated into educational environments, enabling students to improve academic writing, critical thinking, and digital literacy. This study investigates university students’ perspectives on the integration of AI-supported creative media platforms in higher education and examines their influence on learning engagement, academic performance, and digital competence. A quantitative research design was employed using an online questionnaire administered to undergraduate students from higher education institutions. Descriptive statistical techniques were used to analyze the collected data. The findings indicate that students perceive AI-assisted creative media platforms as valuable tools for enhancing academic productivity, increasing learning motivation, and facilitating collaborative learning experiences. However, participants also expressed concerns regarding academic integrity, overreliance on AI-generated content, and insufficient digital literacy. The study concludes that the successful integration of AI technologies into higher education requires comprehensive institutional policies, continuous teacher professional development, and the promotion of responsible AI use. The findings contribute to the growing body of literature on AI-enhanced education by offering practical implications for educators, policymakers, and higher education administrators seeking to foster innovative and student-centered learning environments.
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence creative media platforms higher education digital learning student perspectives academic writing digital literacy educational technologyReferences
BERA. (2024). Ethical guidelines for educational research (5th ed.). British Educational Research Association.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative AI. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. MIT Press.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL IOE Press.
Rashidova, G. (2026). TEACHING WRITING SKILLS THROUGH COLLABORATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUE. ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОЛОГИИ (МАГИСТРАТУРА), 1(2/1), 531-534.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing research instruments. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39).
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gulshoda Ilhomiddin kizi Rashidova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
