On the Categories of Institutional Discourse in Linguistics

Authors

  • Oriental University
  • Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18864428

Abstract

This article provides a systematic analysis of the concept of institutional discourse in modern linguistics, describing its theoretical foundations, essential features, and the categories that determine its structure and functioning. The study reviews leading scholarly views, conceptual approaches, and methodological principles, and summarizes previous research through comparative, descriptive, and analytical methods. Particular attention is paid to the influence of social status, institutional roles, and communicative intentions of participants, which shape discourse strategies, tactics, and patterns of interaction. The paper emphasizes the significance of extra-linguistic factors, including social, cultural, psychological, and pragmatic aspects, in the production and interpretation of institutional communication. It demonstrates how linguistic units operate together with contextual conditions to form stable genres and recurring communicative models. The results clarify the structural and functional characteristics of institutional discourse, develop a typology of its genres and types, and provide theoretical generalizations and practical recommendations. The research offers an interdisciplinary framework that can serve as a reliable basis for further linguistic and discourse studies.

Keywords:

Discourse institutional discourse pragmatics communicative situation social role speech activity

References

Арутюнова, Н. Д. (1999). Язык и мир человека. Москва: Языки русской культуры.

Бенвенист, Э. (1974). Общая лингвистика. Москва: Прогресс.

Большой энциклопедический словарь. Языкознание / под ред. В. Н. Ярцевой. (1990). Москва: Советская энциклопедия. Статья «Дискурс». 136–137. Электронный ресурс: http://tapemark.narod.ru/les/136g.html

Карасик, В. И. (1992). Язык социального статуса. Москва: Институт языкознания РАН; Гнозис.

Карасик, В. И. (1994). Языковая личность и категории языка. В Языковая личность: проблемы значения и смысла. 14–24. Волгоград: [Издательство не указано].

Карасик, В. И. (2000). О типах дискурса. В Языковая личность: институциональный и персональный дискурс: сб. науч. тр. 5–20. Волгоград: Перемена.

Карасик, В. И. (2006). О категориях дискурса. В Языковая личность: институциональный и персональный дискурс. 5–20. Волгоград: Перемена.

Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/410730

Published

Downloads

Author Biographies

Khazifakhan Islamjanova,
Oriental University

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, Department of Languages-2

Tamilla Dilshod qizi Annazarova,
Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies

Lecturer, Department of Languages–2, Oriental University, Independent Researcher, Higher School of Turkology

How to Cite

Islamjanova, K., & Annazarova, T. D. qizi. (2026). On the Categories of Institutional Discourse in Linguistics. The Lingua Spectrum, 2(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18864428