The effectiveness of open-ended versus closed-ended questioning on student participation in middle school EFL classes: conceptual foundations and methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20998153
Abstract
This article explores the conceptual foundations and methodological approaches to investigating the effectiveness of open-ended and closed-ended questioning techniques on student participation in middle school English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. The paper analyzes the theoretical origins of teacher questioning research and highlights the importance of questioning strategies in linguistic research and foreign language teaching methodology. Emphasis is placed on the role of cognitive demand, classroom interaction patterns, and authentic communicative context in shaping student participation behavior. The article reviews research methods applicable to the study of questioning effectiveness and suggests directions for further investigation. Drawing on Long’s Interaction Hypothesis, Swain’s Output Hypothesis, and Bloom’s revised taxonomy, the study demonstrates how open-ended questioning integrated with authentic materials produces substantially greater gains in student participation frequency, response length, speaking proficiency, and affective attitudes compared to traditional closed-ended approaches. The findings also emphasize the importance of learner-centered instruction, critical thinking development, and interactive classroom environments in improving communicative competence and motivating students to actively engage in foreign language learning processes.
Keywords:
Open-ended questions closed-ended questions student participation EFL Bloom’s taxonomy classroom interaction speaking proficiency authentic materials teacher questioning communicative competenceReferences
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Fang He. (2024). The impact of teacher questioning on student participation in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(3), 412–425.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175–199). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. 413–468. Academic Press.
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. 268–285. Newbury House.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Saballa, M. (2024). Open-ended questioning and student engagement in EFL contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2), 389–412.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. 471–483. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taguchi, N. (2018). Pragmatic competence in foreign language education. Mouton de Gruyter.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. Longman.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
Wulandari, R., et al. (2025). Integrating authentic materials in secondary EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45–58.
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Laziza Anvarovna Turgunova, Lyutsiya Rafailovna Shamsutdinova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
