The role of specialized vocabulary in developing the lexical competence of oil and gas students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23864127
Abstract
Specialized vocabulary is essential to English for Specific Purposes (ESP), particularly in technical disciplines where learners are expected to understand and use field-specific language in academic and professional contexts. For oil and gas students, lexical demands extend beyond knowledge of individual technical terms to include specialized meanings, multi-word units, collocations, and appropriate contextual use. This article examines the role of specialized vocabulary in developing the lexical competence of oil and gas students. Drawing on research in ESP and second-language vocabulary studies, it distinguishes specialized vocabulary, understood as field-specific lexical content, from lexical competence, which encompasses learners’ broader knowledge and ability to understand and use lexical items. The analysis suggests that systematic attention to specialized vocabulary can contribute to several dimensions of lexical competence, including knowledge of lexical meaning, contextual appropriateness, collocational knowledge, and productive lexical use. The article further discusses pedagogical implications for selecting, presenting, and practising specialized vocabulary in Oil and Gas ESP courses.
Keywords:
Lexical competence specialized vocabulary English for Specific Purposes Oil and Gas English technical vocabulary vocabulary teachingReferences
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66770
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2004). Identifying technical vocabulary. System, 32(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.11.008
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
Coxhead, A. (2013). Vocabulary and ESP. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes. 115–132. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch6
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002089
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2002). El concepto de competencia léxica en los estudios de aprendizaje y enseñanza de segundas lenguas. Atlantis, 24(2), 149–162.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585941
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077
Ward, J. (2007). Collocation and technicality in EAP engineering. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.10.001
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fariza Maksutovna Musayeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent city, 
+998 93 097 75 88