Intangible cultural heritage as an object of didactic authenticity in German language teaching (a comparison of Germany and Uzbekistan)

Authors

  • Uzbek state world languages university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23864400
Intangible cultural heritage as an object of didactic authenticity in German language teaching (a comparison of Germany and Uzbekistan)

Abstract

This article examines intangible cultural heritage as a source of authentic materials for teaching German as a foreign language. Its purpose is to identify the didactic potential of texts associated with cultural practices in Germany and Uzbekistan and to outline their use in communicatively oriented instruction. Drawing on language teaching scholarship and UNESCO documents, the study compares heritage domains and distinguishes institutional descriptions, accounts produced by tradition bearers, and public discussions. It argues for adapting task demands to learners’ proficiency while preserving the original communicative character of source materials. Three classroom formats are proposed: reconstructing an informational text, interpreting video testimony from different perspectives, and preparing a classroom nomination of a local cultural practice. Comparing familiar and unfamiliar traditions is presented as an opportunity to practise description, argumentation, and intercultural communication. The proposed framework is intended for lesson planning at B1–B2 levels rather than as evidence of measured instructional effectiveness.

Keywords:

Authenticity didactic authenticity authentic materials German as a foreign language intangible cultural heritage intercultural learning

References

Altmayer, C. (2008). Von der ‚interkulturellen Kompetenz‘ zum ‚kulturbezogenen Deutungslernen‘: Plädoyer für eine kritische Transformation des ‚interkulturellen Ansatzes‘ in der Landeskunde. In R. A. Schulz & E. Tschirner (Hrsg.), Communicating across borders: Developing intercultural competence in German as a foreign language. 28–41. Iudicium.

Barkowski, H., & Krumm, H.-J. (Hrsg.). (2010). Fachlexikon Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache. A. Francke Verlag.

Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. (2025). Bundesweites Verzeichnis Immaterielles Kulturerbe 2025. https://www.unesco.de/dokumente-und-hintergruende/publikationen/detail/bundesweites-verzeichnis-immaterielles-kulturerbe-2025/

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144

Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasi. (2011, 23-fevral). Nomoddiy madaniy meros muhofazasiga oid normativ-huquqiy hujjatlarni tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida (47-son qaror). https://lex.uz/docs/-1756739

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-safeguarding-intangible-cultural-heritage

Ярмакеев, И. Э., Пименова, Т. С., & Абдрафикова, А. Р. (2022). Аутентичность как методическая категория в теории и практике преподавания иностранного (английского) языка. Филология и культура, 1(67), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2022-67-1-228-234

Published

Downloads

Author Biography

Yusub Niyazmetovich Ismailov,
Uzbek state world languages university

Associate Professor, Department of German Philology

How to Cite

Ismailov, Y. N. (2026). Intangible cultural heritage as an object of didactic authenticity in German language teaching (a comparison of Germany and Uzbekistan). The Lingua Spectrum, 10(1), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23864400