Pedagogical conditions for developing the cognitive competence of future teachers through facilitative interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23864569
Abstract
The article examines the problem of developing the cognitive competence of future teachers within the system of higher pedagogical education. The significance of facilitative interaction as a pedagogical mechanism for enhancing cognitive activity, developing critical thinking, independence, and reflective analysis is substantiated. The essence of future teachers' cognitive competence is explored, and its structural components are identified. Particular attention is paid to identifying and theoretically substantiating the pedagogical conditions that ensure the effectiveness of this process. These conditions include creating a subject-subject educational environment, organizing problem-based dialogic interaction, applying interactive teaching methods, and ensuring systematic reflective activity among students. The role of the teacher as a facilitator who guides students' cognitive activity and creates conditions for the independent construction of professional knowledge is defined.
Keywords:
Cognitive competence future teachers facilitative interaction pedagogical conditions cognitive activity subject-subject interaction critical thinking reflection professional trainingReferences
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Myshlenie i rech’ [Thinking and speech]. Labirint. (Original work published 1934)
Valieva, N. (2024). Formation of Students’ Sociolinguistic Competence at Foreign Language Lessons. News of the NUUz, 1(1), 78–81.
Valieva, N. (2023). Linguocultural aspect of teaching foreign languages as an integral part of educational process. Til va adabiyot ta’limi, 47–48.
Piaget, J. (2003). Psikhologiya intellekta [The psychology of intelligence]. Piter. (Original work published 1947)
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Charles E. Merrill.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.
Popova, O. V., & Tsapko, A. M. (2020). Justifying the technology stage content of preparing future teachers for pedagogical facilitation in their professional activity. Collection of Research Papers “Pedagogical Sciences”, (93).
Vrieling, E. M., Hebing, R., & Vermeulen, M. (2021). Design principles to support student learning in teacher learning groups. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 27(1–4), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1920909
Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, Article 104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nafisa Khasanovna Rakmankulova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
