Translation strategies for culture-bound units in Chinese spring festival greetings into Uzbek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23864764
Abstract
This article examines the translation of culture-bound units found in Chinese Spring Festival (春节) greetings into Uzbek from semantic, pragmatic, and intercultural perspectives. Particular attention is paid to the extent to which the lexical meanings and the associative, symbolic, and communicative content of such expressions as 福, 吉祥, 团圆, 万事如意, 年年有余, and 恭喜发财 can be preserved in Uzbek. The theoretical framework draws on the approaches of functional equivalence, domestication, and foreignization. The greeting formulas included in a 60-unit working corpus compiled for the study are classified into semantic-pragmatic groups, and the strategies of literal translation, functional substitution, explanatory translation, and combined translation are compared. The analysis demonstrates that lexical correspondence alone is insufficient when translating Chinese festive greetings into Uzbek. The addressee, communicative situation, cultural symbols, and conventional greeting formulas in Uzbek must also be taken into account. For expressions with a strong cultural component, functional equivalents supplemented by brief explanations where necessary provide an effective solution, whereas natural Uzbek greeting formulas are suitable for conveying wishes with universal meanings.
Keywords:
Spring Festival 春节 festive greetings culture-bound units cultural connotation functional equivalence domestication foreignization pragmatic adaptationReferences
Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London/New York: Routledge.
Chen, Y., & Miao, X. (2012). Domestication and Foreignization in the Chinese-English Translation. World Journal of English Language, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v2n2p10
Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Nord, C. (1997). Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Tian, C. (2010). Etymological implications of domestication and foreignization: a Chinese perspective. Perspectives, 18(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09076761003632541
Venuti, L. (1995). The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London/New York: Routledge.
Yao, N., Moindjie, M. A., & Che Lah, S. (2026). Understanding the Use of Domestication and Foreignization: A Systematic Literature Review of Translation Strategies in English–Chinese Cultural Contexts. World Journal of English Language, 16(4), 185. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v16n4p185
Zhong, Y. (2014). Questioning translation readers: Investigating the impact of foreignization and domestication in three Chinese-speaking locales. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 9(2), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.2.06zho
吕叔湘. (1999). 《现代汉语八百词》. 北京: 商务印书馆.
王力. (2004). 《汉语史稿》. 北京: 中华书局.
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Laylo Bahromovna Mamatqulova, Zilola Ismailovna Salisheva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
