Metonymy in English and Uzbek languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20965164
Abstract
This article studies metonymy as a semantic and stylistic phenomenon in English and Uzbek. It explains how metonymic meaning is built on real relations such as part and whole, place and institution, author and work, container and content, and object and social value. The study uses descriptive and comparative analysis of examples from public discourse, literary usage, and everyday communication. The findings show that English and Uzbek share several common metonymic models, because speakers in both languages use one related sign to activate a wider meaning. However, the cultural emphasis is different. English metonymy is especially common in political, institutional, media, and literary discourse, while Uzbek metonymy is more strongly connected with hospitality, family relations, traditional objects, and national symbols. The article also discusses the role of metonymy in translation and language teaching, where literal rendering may weaken cultural meaning and stylistic force for learners, translators, and readers in intercultural communication.
Keywords:
Metonymy English language Uzbek language semantic transfer stylistics comparative linguistics translationReferences
Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.
Brdar, M. (2018). Metonymy and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Hakimova, M. (2019). Leveling lexical abstraction in the Uzbek language. Anglisticum Journal, 8, 36-42.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1996). Semantics and cognition. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. 539-559. Blackwell.
Khudayberganova, D. S. (2015). The anthropocentric study of artistic texts in the Uzbek language (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Tashkent.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Leech, G. (2014). Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. Routledge.
Mahmudov, N. (2017). The study of the mystery of language. Mumtoz So‘z.
Mirtojiev, M. (2010). Semasiology. Tashkent.
Qobuljonova, G. K. (2000). Systemic linguistic interpretation of metaphor (PhD dissertation abstract). Tashkent.
Rahmatullayev, Sh. (2006). Modern Uzbek literary language. Universitet.
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Urolov Sarvar Bakhtiyorovich, Ra’no Ixtiyorovna G‘aybullayeva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
