Productivity of affixes in neo-folk-medical terms: comparative and quantitative research on derivational models
Abstract
This article represents a comparative-quantitative research, aiming to identify the most productive derivational models, suffixes, and prefixes used in the adaptation of traditional folk medicine terms, as used within the context of modern alternative medicine. The current research uses a trilingual corpus, consisting of more than 600 neo-folk medicine terms, to compare the productivity of affixes used within the context of English, Uzbek, and Russian languages. The results of the research identify the suffixes “tion,” “ment,” and “ization” as the most productive affixes used within the context of modern alternative medicine. Moreover, the research identified the prefixes “bio-,” “phyto-,” and “neo-” as essential tools for the creation of innovative terminological models. The current research, which is based on the principles of corpus linguistics and derivational morphology, represents a comprehensive analysis of the affix productivity used within the context of the aforementioned linguistic systems, which can be used for the creation of practical recommendations for the standardization of the terminology used within the context of alternative medicine. The results of the research identified the agglutinative morphological structure of the Uzbek language as a significant factor for the evolution of folk medicine terminology.
Keywords:
Affix productivity neo-folk-medical terminology derivational morphology comparative corpus analysis alternative medicine suffix prefix terminological innovation multilingual studyReferences
Baayen, R. H. (2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook. Vol. 2. 900–919. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.900
Bauer, L. (2019). Rethinking morphology. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474461627
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
Kastovsky, D. (2009). Astronaut, astrologer, astrophysicist: Science words and their structure. In R. W. McConchie, A. Honkapohja, & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis. 1–12. Cascadilla. https://www.cascadilla.com/cpx/2009/2kastovsky.pdf
Lieber, R. (2016). Introducing morphology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139093507
Lipka, L. (2002). English lexicology: Lexical structure, word semantics, and word-formation. Gunter Narr Verlag. https://www.narr.de/english-lexicology-7349/
Plag, I. (2018). Word-formation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316411636
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ravshan Isroilovich Xujakulov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
