Productivity of affixes in neo-folk-medical terms: comparative and quantitative research on derivational models

Authors

  • Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages
Productivity of affixes in neo-folk-medical terms: comparative and quantitative research on derivational models

Abstract

This article represents a comparative-quantitative research, aiming to identify the most productive derivational models, suffixes, and prefixes used in the adaptation of traditional folk medicine terms, as used within the context of modern alternative medicine. The current research uses a trilingual corpus, consisting of more than 600 neo-folk medicine terms, to compare the productivity of affixes used within the context of English, Uzbek, and Russian languages. The results of the research identify the suffixes “tion,” “ment,” and “ization” as the most productive affixes used within the context of modern alternative medicine. Moreover, the research identified the prefixes “bio-,” “phyto-,” and “neo-” as essential tools for the creation of innovative terminological models. The current research, which is based on the principles of corpus linguistics and derivational morphology, represents a comprehensive analysis of the affix productivity used within the context of the aforementioned linguistic systems, which can be used for the creation of practical recommendations for the standardization of the terminology used within the context of alternative medicine. The results of the research identified the agglutinative morphological structure of the Uzbek language as a significant factor for the evolution of folk medicine terminology.

Keywords:

Affix productivity neo-folk-medical terminology derivational morphology comparative corpus analysis alternative medicine suffix prefix terminological innovation multilingual study

References

Baayen, R. H. (2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook. Vol. 2. 900–919. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.900

Bauer, L. (2019). Rethinking morphology. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474461627

Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001

Kastovsky, D. (2009). Astronaut, astrologer, astrophysicist: Science words and their structure. In R. W. McConchie, A. Honkapohja, & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis. 1–12. Cascadilla. https://www.cascadilla.com/cpx/2009/2kastovsky.pdf

Lieber, R. (2016). Introducing morphology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139093507

Lipka, L. (2002). English lexicology: Lexical structure, word semantics, and word-formation. Gunter Narr Verlag. https://www.narr.de/english-lexicology-7349/

Plag, I. (2018). Word-formation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316411636

Published

Downloads

Author Biography

Ravshan Isroilovich Xujakulov,
Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages

Assistant Teacher, Department of English Language Theory

How to Cite

Xujakulov, R. I. (2026). Productivity of affixes in neo-folk-medical terms: comparative and quantitative research on derivational models. The Lingua Spectrum, 3(1), 106–113. Retrieved from https://lingvospektr.uz/index.php/lngsp/article/view/1553