Антропоморфизм как риторический прием в медиакоммуникации

Авторы

  • Узбекский государственный университет мировых языков
Антропоморфизм как риторический прием в медиакоммуникации

Аннотация

Антропоморфизм  –  приписывание человеческих качеств неживым объектам  –  широко используется в медиакоммуникации как риторическое средство. В данном исследовании рассматривается, как антропоморфизм действует как убедительная стратегия в различных жанрах медиа, включая рекламу, социальную рекламу и брендинговые материалы. С применением качественного метода и риторического анализа были целенаправленно отобраны и проанализированы двенадцать медийных текстов, чтобы выявить, какую коммуникативную роль играют антропоморфные образы в формировании восприятия и вовлечённости аудитории. Результаты показывают, что антропоморфизм выполняет три ключевые риторические функции: эмоциональное вовлечение, моральную ориентацию и упрощение сложных или абстрактных понятий. Эмоционально, антропоморфные персонажи  –  говорящие животные, одушевленные предметы или персонифицированные природные элементы  –  способствуют формированию связи и сочувствия, побуждая зрителей лучше воспринимать сообщение. Морально, такие образы представляют вопросы защиты окружающей среды или здравоохранения в этическом контексте, призывая аудиторию к ответственности. Когнитивно, антропоморфизм упрощает технические или абстрактные темы, подавая их в понятной и "человечной" форме, что облегчает понимание и снижает психологическую дистанцию.Таким образом, антропоморфизм представляет собой не просто стилистическое украшение, а мощный риторический инструмент, намеренно используемый для влияния на понимание и поведение аудитории. Несмотря на очевидную эффективность, его этические аспекты требуют дальнейшего изучения. В будущем следует исследовать, как разные аудитории воспринимают антропоморфные медиа-сообщения и какие долгосрочные последствия может иметь эта риторическая стратегия для общественного дискурса.

Ключевые слова:

антропоморфизм вовлечение аудитории медиакоммуникация моральная ориентация обобщение риторическая стратегия убеждение

Introduction

Anthropomorphism – the attribution of human characteristics, emotions, or intentions to non-human entities – has long been employed as a rhetorical device in media communication. Its presence is widespread in advertising, entertainment, and digital media, where it serves to simplify complex ideas, enhance emotional appeal, and foster audience engagement (Epley, Waytz, & Cacioppo, 2007). Whether through animated characters, AI assistants, or corporate mascots, anthropomorphism functions not only as a stylistic device but also as a persuasive tool that shapes how messages are interpreted and internalized.. In recent years, there has been growing scholarly interest in the emotional and cognitive impact of anthropomorphism, especially in how it bridges the gap between complex messages and general audiences. However, a critical gap remains in systematically understanding its strategic use in rhetorical framing across media formats.

The object of this study is anthropomorphism as a rhetorical device in media communication. Specifically, this research focuses on how anthropomorphic elements are strategically employed in media texts to construct persuasive messages, engage audiences emotionally, and shape narrative meaning. By analyzing examples from various media genres, the study seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of the rhetorical functions and communicative impacts of anthropomorphism in modern media discourse.

Media scholars have argued that anthropomorphism aids in creating relatable narratives by humanizing abstract or inanimate subjects, thus increasing audience receptivity (Guthrie, 1993). Moreover, its rhetorical power lies in its ability to evoke empathy, project familiarity, and influence attitudes – making it a strategic element in campaigns ranging from environmental awareness to product marketing (Tam, Lee, & Chao, 2013). Despite its frequent use, however, the role of anthropomorphism as a deliberate rhetorical strategy across media contexts remains underexplored in communication studies.

This study aims to investigate how anthropomorphism functions rhetorically in media communication. By analyzing selected media texts across genres, the research seeks to understand how humanizing non-human elements contributes to meaning-making, persuasion, and audience engagement.

Methods

This study adopts a qualitative research approach to explore the rhetorical use of anthropomorphism in media communication. The analysis focuses on selected media texts that prominently feature anthropomorphic elements, including advertising campaigns, animated films, environmental public service announcements, and corporate branding materials. These texts were chosen through purposive sampling to ensure relevance to the study’s objectives and to reflect a range of genres and communication purposes.

The primary method of data collection involved the compilation of media texts published or broadcast within the past five years. A total of twelve media examples were selected based on criteria such as the centrality of anthropomorphic representation, cultural relevance, and accessibility. Texts were sourced from digital platforms, advertising databases, and corporate websites.

The study employed rhetorical analysis as its main analytical framework, with particular attention to how anthropomorphism functions as a persuasive and meaning-making strategy. The analysis examined elements such as visual and verbal personification, narrative voice, emotional appeal, and audience positioning. Each text was analyzed individually, followed by a cross-textual comparison to identify recurring patterns, rhetorical functions, and communicative outcomes.

To ensure the credibility of the findings, researcher triangulation was used by consulting existing literature on rhetorical theory, media semiotics, and anthropomorphism. This supported the interpretation of results and grounded the analysis in established theoretical frameworks.

Results

The analysis of the twelve selected media texts revealed three dominant rhetorical functions of anthropomorphism: emotional engagement, moral positioning, and simplification of abstract concepts. Each of these functions was evident across multiple genres, including advertisements, public service announcements, and animated narratives.

  1. Emotional Engagement

Anthropomorphism was consistently used to evoke empathy and emotional resonance. For example, a beverage commercial featured a talking polar bear experiencing joy and sadness, which served to humanize the brand and generate an emotional connection with viewers. This use of human-like emotions in non-human characters appeared to lower resistance to advertising messages by fostering familiarity and relatability. Emotional appeal was especially strong in campaigns involving animals or natural elements, such as trees or oceans, depicted with human faces or voices. These depictions often conveyed vulnerability and elicited protective or compassionate responses from the audience.

  1. Moral Positioning and Ethical Framing

Several public service announcements employed anthropomorphism to deliver moral messages. For instance, an environmental campaign portrayed the ocean as a crying, sentient entity suffering from plastic pollution. This rhetorical choice framed environmental degradation as a form of moral harm done to a "personified" nature, thereby intensifying the ethical stakes of ecological issues. Similarly, anti-smoking campaigns used anthropomorphic lungs with faces and voices to dramatize the physical damage caused by tobacco, positioning the viewer as a responsible agent capable of making ethical health decisions.

  1. Simplification of Abstract or Technical Concepts

In technology and finance-related media, anthropomorphism served as a tool for simplifying complex systems. An AI assistant was presented in the form of a friendly animated character with a human-like voice and gestures. This representation made the technology appear more intuitive and trustworthy, thereby reducing the cognitive load on users. Likewise, an insurance company ad depicted abstract policies and risk factors using a cartoon character that “explained” terms in humanized language, making difficult content more accessible to the general public.

Across all media examples, anthropomorphism was not simply decorative – it functioned rhetorically to shape meaning, guide audience interpretation, and direct emotional and cognitive engagement. The recurrence of these rhetorical functions suggests a strategic deployment of anthropomorphism, tailored to the communicative goals of persuasion, education, or branding. These results underline the persuasive power of humanizing non-human elements in media communication and set the foundation for further interpretive and critical analysis in the discussion section.

Another example, in the widely recognized "Dumb Ways to Die" campaign, anthropomorphic cartoon characters personify dangerous behaviors, making the message of train safety more impactful and memorable. Another example includes the use of talking animals in PETA advertisements to evoke empathy toward animal rights.

In most cases, anthropomorphic characters serve as ethical messengers (ethos), evoke emotional responses (pathos), and simplify complex information (logos). Additionally, anthropomorphism appears to reduce resistance to persuasive messages by presenting them in familiar and entertaining forms. These findings align with previous research which suggests that human-like features can foster empathy and trust (Waytz et al., 2010).

Discussion

The findings of this study demonstrate that anthropomorphism is a multifaceted rhetorical strategy employed in media communication to enhance engagement, deliver moral narratives, and simplify complex information. Far from being a purely aesthetic or narrative device, anthropomorphism serves strategic functions that align closely with the persuasive goals of various media texts.

The emotional appeal of anthropomorphized characters, particularly animals and natural elements, reflects a broader media tendency to humanize content in order to foster empathy. This supports Epley et al.’s (2007) theory that people are cognitively predisposed to attribute human-like qualities to non-human entities when seeking connection or understanding. In the media examples studied, anthropomorphism was particularly effective in eliciting viewer empathy and encouraging affective responses, which in turn facilitated message retention and acceptance. The emotional resonance created by these humanized representations appears to bypass rational skepticism, engaging audiences on a more intuitive level.

The use of anthropomorphism for moral framing was also significant. By portraying nature or internal organs as sentient beings capable of suffering, media texts positioned audiences as ethical actors, thereby intensifying the persuasive power of the message. This rhetorical move aligns with Tam et al.’s (2013) findings that anthropomorphism increases people’s willingness to protect and care for non-human entities. In this way, anthropomorphism serves not only to engage but also to ethically orient the audience, transforming abstract issues into personal, morally charged narratives.

Furthermore, the simplification function observed in technology and finance-related media highlights how anthropomorphism can reduce complexity and build trust. By assigning human traits to abstract systems – such as AI or insurance – these texts made information more accessible and less intimidating. This simplification strategy reflects a communicative adaptation to audience needs, making anthropomorphism a practical tool for reducing psychological distance and improving comprehension.

Taken together, these findings suggest that anthropomorphism is a rhetorically powerful and versatile device. It functions on both emotional and cognitive levels, contributing significantly to how media messages are framed, delivered, and received. However, this study also raises critical questions about potential manipulative uses of anthropomorphism, especially when emotional appeal is leveraged to obscure factual accuracy or oversimplify complex issues.

Future research could expand on these insights by examining audience reception more directly, exploring how different demographics respond to anthropomorphized media, or analyzing its use in emerging digital platforms such as virtual assistants and AI-generated content.

Conclusion

This study has shown that anthropomorphism operates as a strategic rhetorical device in media communication, serving purposes beyond mere entertainment or stylistic appeal. Through the analysis of diverse media texts, three primary rhetorical functions were identified: fostering emotional engagement, framing moral narratives, and simplifying complex or abstract content. These functions demonstrate how human-like representations of non-human entities are purposefully used to shape audience interpretation, influence attitudes, and enhance message effectiveness.

Anthropomorphism proves especially powerful in engaging audiences emotionally, establishing ethical connections, and rendering otherwise inaccessible topics more relatable. Whether used to represent environmental issues, promote public health, or explain technological innovations, anthropomorphism enhances the persuasive and interpretive potential of media messages. It creates cognitive and emotional bridges between the message and the audience, reinforcing the message’s impact and memorability.

However, the study also highlights the need for a critical perspective on the ethical implications of anthropomorphic persuasion. While it can serve educational and prosocial objectives, it may also be used manipulatively to oversimplify issues or evoke emotional responses that bypass critical reasoning.

In conclusion, anthropomorphism remains a potent communicative tool in modern media. Its rhetorical versatility underscores the importance of continued research into how media strategies influence public understanding and behavior. Future studies could build on this foundation by examining audience reception across cultures and media platforms or by analyzing the long-term effects of anthropomorphized communication in shaping public discourse.

Библиографические ссылки

Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096

Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

Friedman, H. S., & Riggio, R. E. (2010). Nonverbal communication. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 776–828). Wiley.

Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Mitchell, R. W., Thompson, N. S., & Miles, H. L. (Eds.). (1997). Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals. State University of New York Press.

Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001

Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336

Wells, W. D., Burnett, J., & Moriarty, S. (2006). Advertising: Principles and practice (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. (2019). Metaphor and anthropomorphism in communication: A cognitive-semiotic approach. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2019-0003

Опубликован

Загрузки

Биография автора

Гульзира Кодирова ,
Узбекский государственный университет мировых языков

Магистрант

Как цитировать

Кодирова , Г. (2025). Антропоморфизм как риторический прием в медиакоммуникации. Лингвоспектр, 4(1), 542–547. извлечено от https://lingvospektr.uz/index.php/lngsp/article/view/767

Похожие статьи

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

Вы также можете начать расширеннвй поиск похожих статей для этой статьи.