AI-Assisted Feedback in EFL Writing: Implications for Writing Accuracy and Learner Autonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23864054
Abstract
This structured thematic literature review synthesizes peer-reviewed empirical research published between 2020 and 2026 on AI-assisted feedback in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing, examining its dual implications for writing accuracy and learner autonomy. Drawing on foundational theories of written corrective feedback, self-regulated learning, and learner autonomy, the review analyzes studies comparing AI-generated, teacher-provided, and hybrid feedback models. Findings indicate that AI feedback appears to improve surface-level accuracy in the reviewed studies, although its effectiveness remains inconsistent regarding higher-order concerns, including coherence, argumentation, and organization. Furthermore, its influence on learner autonomy depends largely on pedagogical design, learners’ critical engagement, and teachers’ guidance. The review argues that accuracy and autonomy are interdependent outcomes shaped by instructional integration rather than technological tools alone. It identifies critical research gaps, particularly the lack of longitudinal evidence and limited research involving lower-proficiency learners, and proposes pedagogical recommendations for human-centered AI implementation in EFL writing classrooms.
Keywords:
AI-assisted feedback EFL writing writing accuracy learner autonomy automated written corrective feedback generative AI ChatGPT self-regulated learningReferences
Alnemrat, A., Aldamen, H., Almashour, M., Al-Deaibes, M., & AlSharefeen, R. (2025). AI vs. teacher feedback on EFL argumentative writing: A quantitative study. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1614673. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1614673
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge University Press.
Han, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context. System, 123, Article 103354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103354
Khodaie Alvar, F., & Sahebkheir, F. (2025). The effect of AI-assisted feedback vs. teacher corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners' grammatical accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 5(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.57647/jals.2025.0502.08
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0
Little, D., Dam, L., & Legenhausen, L. (2017). Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Multilingual Matters.
Mizumoto, A., Eguchi, M., & Oyama, A. (2024). Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), Article 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100131
Nguyen, Q., & Doan Thi Hue, D. (2025). ChatGPT's effects on EFL learners' autonomy and self-efficacy in self-regulated learning contexts. The JALT CALL Journal, 21(2), Article 102968. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102968
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Özdere, M. (2025). AI in academic writing: Assessing the effectiveness, grading consistency, and student perspectives of ChatGPT and You.com for EFL students. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(1), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1001
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://doi.org/10.54675/QTMR8092
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency frameworks for students and teachers.
Wang, D. (2024). Teacher- versus AI-generated (Poe application) corrective feedback and language learners' writing anxiety, complexity, fluency, and accuracy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7646
Yang, Y., Hussin, S., & Hashim, H. (2025). Revising with intelligence: ChatGPT feedback and its impact on EFL students' revision and self-efficacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9845
Zhai, Y. (2025). Automated written corrective feedback: Fostering writing accuracy, self-regulation, and motivational dynamics in EFL learners. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 402. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03765-y
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Madina Amrullo qizi Sulaymonova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
