Research-based learning in teaching the Russian language at university: theory, methodology and pedagogical conditions for implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20995875
Abstract
The article is devoted to the theoretical and methodological substantiation of research activities of students in Russian language classes in higher education. The paper reveals the essence of research activity as a pedagogical category, its place in modern educational concepts, and the specifics of its organization in language education. Domestic and international approaches to defining research competence are analyzed; theoretical foundations – the activity approach, constructivism, and self-determination theory – are examined in relation to Russian language teaching. Pedagogical conditions are identified under which research activity becomes an effective instrument for forming linguistic, communicative, and metacognitive competencies. Special attention is paid to the methodological apparatus: diagnostics, assessment, and evaluation of students' research skills; the use of analytical rubrics and performance-based assessment; and the development of transferable skills and soft skills. The results of the analysis of international studies in the field of inquiry-based learning and problem-based learning are presented. The conclusion is drawn that systematic incorporation of research tasks into the Russian language learning process promotes the development of critical thinking, student autonomy, and improvement of the quality of language education.
Keywords:
Research activities Russian language language education communicative competence activity approach problem-based learning assessment rubrics soft skills critical thinking student autonomy metacognitive skillsReferences
Zimnyaya, I. A. (2004). Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Pedagogical psychology: Textbook for universities]. Logos.
Passov, E. I. (1991). Kommunikativnyy metod obucheniya inoyazychnomu govoreniyu [Communicative method of teaching foreign language speaking]. Prosveshchenie.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Myshlenie i rech [Thought and language]. Labirint.
Makhmutov, M. I. (1975). Problemnoye obucheniye: Osnovnyye voprosy teorii [Problem-based learning: Key theoretical issues]. Pedagogika.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Leontiev, A. A. (1969). Yazyk, rech, rechevaya deyatelnost [Language, speech, speech activity]. Prosveshchenie.
Shchukin, A. N. (2004). Obucheniye inostrannym yazykam: Teoriya i praktika [Teaching foreign languages: Theory and practice]. Filomatis.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Savignon, S. J. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. McGraw-Hill.
Leontiev, A. N. (1975). Deyatelnost. Soznaniye. Lichnost [Activity, consciousness, personality]. Politizdat.
Kudryavtsev, V. T. (1991). Problemnoye obucheniye: Istoki, sushchnost, perspektivy [Problem-based learning: Origins, essence, prospects]. Znanie.
Published
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azizkhon Bositkhonovich Rakhmonov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
